On January 20, 2026, former US President Donald Trump publicly released a private message from French President Emmanuel Macron on his social media platform Truth Social. The disclosure, which took place ahead of key international meetings in Davos, has prompted questions over the security of diplomatic exchanges and the broader impact on global political trust.
China’s New Stealth Submarine Can Strike the U.S. Without Leaving Port
A Private Message Made Public
The message, confirmed by the Élysée Palace, was intended as a confidential diplomatic communication between the two heads of state. It touched on sensitive geopolitical topics including Syria, Iran, and notably Greenland. Macron’s tone was conciliatory, opening with “My friend” and signaling a willingness to maintain dialogue despite growing strategic differences.
Rather than an accusatory note, Macron’s message featured diplomatic phrasing aimed at exploring alignment on shared concerns, before expressing unease regarding Trump’s renewed interest in Greenland. The French president questioned the US posture toward the Danish territory, framing it as a point of confusion rather than direct criticism.
Diplomacy without Discretion
Toward the end of the message, Macron proposed holding a G7 meeting in Paris following Davos, coupled with informal talks including Ukrainian, Danish, Syrian, and Russian representatives. A bilateral dinner in Paris was also suggested as part of efforts to diffuse tension through private channels.
By publicizing the content of this message, Trump potentially undercut these diplomatic initiatives. When such negotiations become part of the public arena, involved parties are often restricted by domestic pressures and may lose the flexibility necessary for conflict prevention and resolution.
Impact On International Trust
The publication of the message has triggered concerns among global leaders regarding the erosion of discretion in diplomacy. Confidential communication is essential for heads of state to express doubts, suggest off-the-record compromises, and seek common ground without political repercussions.
This precedent could lead to a chilling effect: fewer frank exchanges and a preference for formal, scripted dialogue, which often lacks the nuance required to resolve complex disputes. In the longer term, such developments might limit the international community’s ability to preempt emerging crises.
